Slate

An arcades project

User Tools

Site Tools


internet_as_a_space_for_psychogeographical_projects

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
internet_as_a_space_for_psychogeographical_projects [2019/02/01 20:18]
morgan
internet_as_a_space_for_psychogeographical_projects [2019/12/23 16:39]
morgan
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== The internet as a space for psychogeographical projects ====== ====== The internet as a space for psychogeographical projects ======
  
-We can’t get more awkward than this statement, but the idea is to take SI to new turfBrowsing is dériveAlways has been. And crossing spaces has taken on a psychological turn as early as AOL+{{ :si_debord.jpeg?400 |}} 
 +[Revista Bostezo  - Manuel Gomez Burns | illustration](https://www.mgomezburns.net/Revista-Bostezo)
  
 +The statement is awkward but the idea is to take SI to new turf. Browsing is dérive. Always has been. And crossing spaces has taken on a psychological turn as early as AOL. 
  
-The idea of mapping the net has been around from the beginning. But it hasn’t been done. Perhaps because on the internet, the map is the territory. Doesn’t matter because this is psychogeography, not cartography. +The idea of mapping the net has been around from the beginning. But it hasn’t been done. Perhaps because on the internet, the map is the territory. Doesn’t matter because this is psychogeography, not cartography.
  
-Who? Addicts. Specialists. Browsers skilled at dérive. Coasting. Crossing over edges. Ignoring paths. Both of which are difficult in a space defined by edges and nodes. +The net wasn’t planned. Yet there are planned spaces - walled gardens, facebooks, blogs, googles, institutions, reddits, 4chans, haciendas. There are protocols that define space: ftp, http, https, irc, usenet. Domains. These features make the net a territory for dérive, for mapping.  
 + 
 +And then there’s the boredom. Nothing new from the people moving on the net. And the power plays. Institutions attempting to regularize their own spaces and those who pass through. Mediums, twitters. For the sake of quality. For the sake of excitement. Attempts to commodify the streets we travel. Browsing becomes addiction, because a good consumer is goal-oriented. The goal being attention. Pages that pose as apps. Apps as pages. Catalogues and collections: monoskop, tates, libraries, sites of collected lists and forgotten umbrellas.  
 + 
 +The drive towards normalization becomes visible with pushback.  
 +  
 +Who? Addicts. Specialists. Browsers skilled at dérive. Coasting. Crossing over edges. Ignoring paths. Both of which are difficult in a space defined by edges and nodes. Takes some planning.  
 + 
 +And see notes on Rogers, Digital Methods, for psychogeograpy of the web
  
 === Challenges === === Challenges ===
Line 13: Line 23:
  
 ---- ----
- 
 ---- ----
  
 +Look also to Perec, articles on space and inscription 
internet_as_a_space_for_psychogeographical_projects.txt · Last modified: 2019/12/23 19:25 by morgan